Which technique is least effective in resolving group conflict?

Avoidance is considered the least effective technique for resolving group conflict because it involves ignoring the conflict or withdrawing from the situation rather than addressing it directly. This approach does not contribute to finding a resolution or fostering understanding among group members. Instead of facilitating open communication and problem-solving, avoidance leaves the underlying issues unaddressed, which can lead to escalating tensions or resentment over time.

In contrast, the other techniques, such as compromise, collaboration, and facilitation, actively engage participants in the conflict. Compromise requires parties to find a middle ground where all involved make concessions, promoting a sense of closure. Collaboration encourages joint problem-solving to find a solution that satisfies everyone involved, fostering relationships and trust. Facilitation involves a neutral party helping to guide the discussion, ensuring each voice is heard and enabling a productive conversation. These methods are proactive in addressing conflict, leading to more constructive outcomes for the group.